Divergent inlet for bulk material feeder and method of retrofiting feeder with same

ABSTRACT

A bulk material feeder for improving material flow as the material makes the generally ninety degree (90°) transition from the downcomer to the generally horizontal conveyor. The downcomer presents an innermost divergent surface that extends upwardly from the discharge opening of the downcomer. The divergent surface may be defined by an inlet wall that is fit within the outer casing wall of the downcomer, or by the outer casing wall itself. The present invention also concerns the method of retrofitting an existing feeder with a divergent inlet.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 09/309,090 filed May 10, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,273,665.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable

MICROFICHE APPENDIX

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1.Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to bulk material feeders and, more particularly, to a divergent inlet that improves material flow from the supply downcomer to the horizontal conveyor of the feeder.

2. Discussion of Prior Art

Those ordinarily skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous processes involve conveying a mass or masses of solid particulate material (alternatively referred to as bulk material) along a path from one location to another. Moreover, the material flow path will often involve a transition from generally downward flow to substantially horizontal flow. For example, bulk material will commonly pass through a downcomer to a substantially horizontal conveyor, whereby the material is directed downwardly through the downcomer to the conveyor and then carried horizontally away from the downcomer by the conveyor. Such an arrangement is often designed to move the material along the path or, in some instances, control the volume-rate or mass-rate of flow of material along the path. In addition, the downcomer and horizontal conveyor are often collectively referred to as a bulk material feeder.

In any case, there are often problems associated with material flow through a bulk material feeder. For example, the material is often not transferred to the conveyor at a uniform rate, even though there is a consistent rate of material being supplied to the downcomer. This problem has been particularly identified with respect to a certain type of bulk material feeder known as a gravimetric feeder. The gravimetric feeder includes a variable speed conveyor which may be designed to change speed in response to the amount of material being carried by the conveyor. In this respect, the conveyor speed may be increased or decreased to ensure that the desired amount of material is being moved by the conveyor. Manifestly, if the material is being unevenly transferred from the downcomer to the conveyor, the conveyor speed will necessarily have to adjust to accommodate for such fluctuations. The virtually continuous increase and decrease in conveyor speed presents numerous additional problems, including undue wear on the feeder components.

Those ordinarily skilled in the art will further appreciate that the downcomer on a gravimetric feeder traditionally includes a downstream discharge opening through which material is permitted to pass as it is moved along the path by the conveyor. In addition, the structure defining the discharge opening is designed to control the amount of material being transferred by the conveyor so as to facilitate relatively even and consistent volumetric transfer of material from the downcomer to the conveyor. This design, of course, assumes that sufficient material is being continuously deposited on the conveyor to cause the material that is moved out of the downcomer by the conveyor to be leveled off as it passes through the discharge opening. However, as will be set forth in further detail below, it has been determined that the traditional downcomer design simply does not permit the discharge opening to operate in the desired manner.

Another type of feeder that is susceptible to some of the aforementioned problems is a volumetric feeder. Such a feeder relies heavily on uniform and accurate volumetric flow and, contrary to a gravimetric feeder, includes no means for adjusting the belt speed in response to fluctuations in the volumetric flow rate.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Responsive to these and other problems, an important object of the present invention is to improve material flow through bulk feeders. In this respect, it is also an important object of the present invention to provide a bulk material feeder having uniform material flow from the downcomer to the conveyor. Another important object of the present invention to improve upon the construction of conventional volumetric and gravimetric feeder designs. Particularly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a feeder that does not suffer from undesirable conveyor speed fluctuations caused by uneven material flow.

In accordance with these and other objects evident from the following description of the preferred embodiments, the present invention concerns a bulk material feeder having a conveyor that is operable to convey material along a substantially horizontal path. Of course, if the principles of the present invention are being used on a gravimetric feeder, the conveyor speed may be adjustable responsive to the amount of material being carried by the conveyor. The feeder further includes a downcomer presenting a lower edge adjacent the conveyor, with the downcomer being configured to deliver the material onto the conveyor in an upright column. Moreover, the downcomer includes an innermost downwardly divergent surface which is believed to significantly improve material flow through the downcomer and onto the conveyor. The present invention also concerns a feeder inlet design that presents the divergent surface and is configured to be installed within an existing downcomer for improving material flow within the feeder without requiring extensive modification to the feeder. In addition, the present invention concerns the method of retrofitting an existing feeder with the inlet design.

Again, it has been determined that the divergent surface ensures that material flow is uniform from the downcomerto the conveyor. Particularly, it is believed that the divergent surface prevents the material from clogging within the downcomer as it flows downwardly toward the conveyor. It is also believed that the innermost divergent surface ensures that the discharge opening operates in its intended manner; that is, the structure defining the discharge opening serves to control the amount of material being moved away from the material column by the conveyor. As previously indicated, this leveling action facilitates uniform volumetrically efficient material transfer by the conveyor. In addition, it is believed that uniform material transfer by the conveyor is further facilitated by the fact that the divergent innermost surface provides essentially only lateral support to the material within the downcomer, such that virtually the entire material column confined by the divergent surface is supported on the conveyor. It is particularly believed that this relatively significant, downwardly directed pressure within the downcomer further decreases material flow fluctuations within the feeder and ensures that the material conveyed by the conveyor has uniform density.

Those ordinarily skilled in the art will appreciate that conventional bulk material feeders simply do not provide the advantages afforded by the present invention. It has been determined that this is primarily attributable to the traditional downcomer construction. Particularly, the downcomer wall is traditionally straight (i.e., generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the downcomer), and it is believed that this straight-walled construction is not conducive to solid particulate material being fed to the conveyor by gravity and then through the discharge opening by the conveyor. It has further been determined that the material tends to bridge across the interior of the straight-walled downcomer and thereby create stoppages of material flow or, at the very least, uneven material flow. This phenomenon referred to herein as “bridging” is a result of the cohesive force of the material and the adhesive force between the material and the downcomer walls overcoming the gravitational influence on the material. Furthermore, it has been determined that material flow to the conveyor is typically uneven enough and insufficient in quantity to permit the discharge opening from operating in its intended manner. These problems become even more troublesome when dealing with a “sticky” material or material that becomes more cohesive as its moisture content increases (e.g., coal).

Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawing figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

Preferred embodiments of the invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a gravimetric-type bulk material feeder having a divergent inlet constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention, with portions of the feeder being broken away to reveal internal details of construction;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevational view of the feeder shown in FIG. 1, particularly illustrating the inlet portion of the downcomer and its relationship to the conveyor;

FIG. 3 is a fragmentary vertical sectional view of the feeder taken along line 3—3 of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 4 is a fragmentary side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention, wherein the innermost downwardly divergent surface of the downcomer is defined by the pipe wall.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Turning first to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1-3, the bulk material feeder 10 selected for illustration is provided along a material flow line that is vertical both upstream and downstream from the feeder 10. The illustrated feeder 10 comprises a traditional gravimetric feeder that serves to control the rate of material flow along the path, although it will be appreciated that the principles of the present invention are equally applicable to various other feeders. With the foregoing caveat in mind, it will be appreciated that the gravimetric feeder 10 includes a material supply downcomer 12 for connecting to the supply line 14 and a downwardly directed discharge spout 16 for connecting to the discharge line 18, in the usual manner. Except for the inventive features identified herein, it is entirely within the ambit of the present invention to variously construct both the downcomer 12 and the discharge spout 16. It is noted that the illustrated gravimetric feeder 10 is particularly well suited for use in a coal-fired power plant. In this respect, the supply line 14 traditionally extends upstream from the downcomer 12 immediately to a coal hopper (not shown), while the discharge line 18 will typically connect directly to a material processing station, such as a mill (also not shown) for pulverizing the coal into a fine highly, combustible powder.

In the usual manner, extending between the downcomer 12 and the discharge spout 18 is a variable speed conveyor 20 for conveying material therebetween. The illustrated conveyor 20 comprises an endless belt 22 that wraps around a pair of horizontally spaced pulleys 24 and 26, one or both of which may be powered to drive the belt 22. The belt 22 presents a substantially horizontal upper conveying stretch 22 a (also referred to as an upper strand) that moves leftwardly, when viewing FIG. 1, to convey material from the downcomer 12 to the discharge spout 16, and a lower return stretch 22 b (also referred to as a lower strand) that moves in the opposite direction. However, it will be appreciated that the principles of the present invention are equally applicable to various other conveyor designs. For example, it is entirely within the ambit of the present invention to provide a conveyor having a noncontinuous conveyor bed, with a plurality of beater bars being located below the bed to facilitate downstream movement of the material along the bed. It is also possible to provide a conveyor with a conveying stretch that slopes slightly downwardly toward the discharge end to promote movement of the material.

As perhaps best shown in FIG. 2, the illustrated conveyor 20 includes a series of support rollers 28,30,32,34,36,38 located along the underside of the conveying stretch 22 a generally below the downcomer 12. The support rollers 28-38 provide support to the belt 22 at the point where the weight of the material is greatest, as will subsequently be described. The rollers 28-38 are similarly constructed, and it therefore shall be sufficient to explain that the downstream roller 28 includes a central cylindrical bar 40 and a pair of stub shafts 42 and 44 projecting from opposite ends of the bar 40 (see FIG. 3). The shafts 42 and 44 are journaled for rotational movement on adjacent support walls 46 and 48 by respective bearing assemblies 50 and 52.

Downstream from the series of support rollers 28-38 are a pair of similarly constructed rollers 54 and 56 that are spaced along the length of the conveying stretch 22 a to define a weigh span therebetween. In the usual manner, a weigh roller 58 is precisely centered along the weigh span and is shiftably supported by a pair of load cells 60 (only one of the load cells being shown in the drawing figures), with the load cells 60 generating an electric signal that is proportional to the weight of material supported on the weigh span. The load cells 60 are connected to the power mechanism (not shown) for the conveyor 20 so that driving power supplied to one or both of the pulleys 24 and 26 may be varied depending upon the weight of the material supported on the weight span. In this respect, the conveyor speed may be adjusted to control the amount of material being moved along the path.

In the illustrated embodiment, the conveyor 20 is contained within a housing 62 that is substantially cylindrical in shape to present a top surface 64, a bottom surface 66, a pair of side surfaces 68 and 70 extending between the top and bottom surfaces 64 and 66, and a pair of end surfaces 72 and 74 sealing off the opposite ends of the housing 62. Those ordinarily skilled in the art will appreciate that when the feeder 10 is used to convey combustible materials the housing 62 is traditionally constructed to standardized explosion pressure ratings. For example, the walls 64,66,68,70,72,74 may be designed to withstand an internal housing pressure of up to one-hundred pounds per square inch. It is noted that each of the end surfaces 72 and 74 has an access opening (not shown) for providing access to the interior of the housing 62, with a pair of doors 76 and 78 being swingably supported on the respective end surfaces 72 and 74 for selectively covering the access openings.

The material deposited on the conveying stretch 22 a by the downcomer 12 is moved toward the discharge pulley 24 and will ultimately drop off the discharge end of the conveyor 20. The material then falls by gravity into the discharge spout 16 and is thereby directed to the discharge line 18. It is noted that the discharge spout 16 has a hopper-type configuration for converting the material flow back into a stream that has a generally circular cross-sectional shape. That is to say, the discharge spout 16 causes the material falling from the conveyor 20 to converge downwardly into the cylindrical discharge line 18. Similar to the housing 62, the discharge spout 16 is preferably designed to withstand a predetermined internal pressure.

As noted above, except for the inventive features described below, the illustrated downcomer 12 is generally conventional in construction. Thus, it shall be sufficient to explain that the downcomer 12 includes an inlet valve 80 connected to the supply line 14 and a vertical pipe 82 extending downwardly from the valve 80 to the conveyor 20. The pipe 82 is cylindrical in shape and divided into three sections 82 a, 82 b, 82 c, although the shape and sectioning of the pipe may vary as desired. The valve 80 and upper pipe section 82 a are fastened to one another in the usual manner by flanges 84 and 86. The adjacent ends of the upper pipe section 82 a and intermediate pipe section 82 b are similarly interconnected by flanges 88 and 90. The lower pipe section 82 c is preferably fixed to the top surface 64 of the housing 62, with the upper end of the lower pipe section 82 c being spaced from the lower end of the intermediate pipe section 82 b. An expansion joint 92 serves to interconnect these two sections of the pipe 82. In the usual manner, the expansion joint includes a pair of vertically spaced rings 94,96, a sleeve 98 interposed in the space between the rings 94 and 96, a plurality of long nut and bolt assemblies 100 spaced circumferentially about the rings 94 and 96, and a gasket (not shown) located between the sleeve 98 and the pipe sections 82 b and 82 c (see FIG. 2). Thus, when the assemblies 100 are tightened, the expansion joint 92 securely seals around the adjacent ends of the intermediate and lower pipe sections 82 b and 82 c, yet permits limited relative movement therebetween.

As perhaps best shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the lower pipe section 82 c defines the lower edge 102 of the downcomer 12, with the edge 102 presenting a generally horizontal section 102 a that is spaced just above the conveying stretch 22 a and a downstream section 102 b that is progressively spaced from the conveying stretch 22 a in the downstream direction. The downstream section 102 b consequently defines a discharge opening 104 through which material is permitted to pass laterally from the downcomer 12. As noted above, the downstream section 102 b of the lower edge 102 is designed to limit or control the amount of material moved out of the downcomer 12 by the conveyor 20. In the illustrated embodiment, the downstream section 102 b is defined along a plane that projects obliquely upward in the downstream direction relative to the conveying stretch 22 a, such that the discharge opening has a so-called “ungular” shape, although the downstream section 102 b may be variously arranged. It is also noted that the lower pipe section 82 c includes an upstream panel 106 that projects upwardly from the lower edge 102 in an upstream direction. However, it is entirely within the ambit of the present invention to eliminate the upstream panel 106 so that the entire lower pipe section 82 c has a circular cross-sectional shape, if desired.

It will be appreciated that the pipe sections 82 a, 82 b, 82 c cooperatively present a casing wall that is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the pipe 82. As previously indicated, it has been determined that this straight-walled construction causes problems with material flow through the feeder. If desired, the pipe sections and the expansion joint 92 may have an explosion resistant construction similar to the discharge spout 16 and housing 62.

In this respect, the illustrated downcomer 12 has been provided with a divergent inlet 108 that is believed to significantly improve material flow through the feeder 10. In the present embodiment, the inlet 108 comprises a tube 110 that is configured to fit lengthwise within the pipe 82. As perhaps best shown in FIG. 2, the tube 110 presents opposite wall sections 110 a and 110 b that diverge outwardly from a central throat 110 c. With the inlet 108 installed in the downcomer 12, the upper wall section 110 a converges downwardly toward the throat 110 c, while the lower wall section 110 b diverges downwardly toward the conveyor 20. The lower divergent wall section 110 b is significantly longer than the upper convergent wall section 110 a, and the lower divergent wall section 110 b preferably has a length that is approximately at least two times greater than the diameter of the pipe 82. However, it is entirely within the ambit of the present invention to vary the length of either or both wall sections (e.g., the upper convergent wall section 110 a could have the same length as the lower divergent wall section 110 b).

A in any case, it will be appreciated that the upper convergent wall section 110 a serves to converge material flow within the downcomer 12 so that it may subsequently diverge as it moves toward the conveyor 20. Although it would be possible to provide a divergent inlet without the upper convergent wall section (e.g., an inlet having a radially inwardly extending flat wall that interconnects the inner surface of the pipe 82 and the throat of the inlet), such an arrangement is more likely to obstruct material flow. Thus, the inlet 108 preferably includes the upper convergent wall section 110 a so that the risk of plugging at the throat 110 c is reduced. It will be appreciated that the inlet 108 must have a section that is of reduced diameter relative to the straight-walled pipe 82, such as the throat 110 c, because the divergent wall section 110 b is located within the pipe 82. The upper convergent wall section 110 a is preferably disposed at an angle between approximately thirteen and fourteen degrees relative to the pipe 82. This angle will be referred herein to as the angle of convergence, and is approximately 13.75 degrees in the illustrated embodiment (note, the illustrated pipe 82 has a diameter of approximately twenty-four inches). It has been determined that the illustrated convergent wall section 110 a does not noticeably affect or impede material flow within the downcomer 12. However, other materials and even other coals may require a different angle of convergence. The angle of convergence may also need to be increased if the downward force of the material above 110 a is insufficient to push the material through the restriction formed by central throat 110 c. For most coals, the stated angle of convergence is sufficient.

The lower divergent wall section 110 b of the inlet 108 projects generally from the lower end of the upper convergent wall section 110 a such that the adjacent ends of the upper and lower sections 110 a and 110 b cooperatively define the throat 110 c, although the throat may be lengthened to extend along the pipe 82 if desired. In any case, the divergent wall section 110 b presents an innermost surface of the downcomer 12, along which the material flows as it moves downwardly toward the conveyor 20. The illustrated divergent wall section 110 b preferably terminates at the uppermost boundary of the discharge opening 104 and projects upwardly therefrom generally to the top of the intermediate pipe section 82 b. The divergent wall section 110 b is preferably disposed at a one degree to two degrees angle relative to the straight wall of the pipe 82. This angle will be referred to herein as the angle of divergence, and the illustrated angle of divergence is 1.25 degrees. Although the angle of divergence may vary, it is important that the divergent wall section 110 b extends sufficiently along the length of the pipe 82. Particularly, the angle of divergence must be large enough to prevent bridging of material within the wall section 110 b but small enough to ensure that the material is delivered onto the conveyor 20 in the manner described hereinbelow.

It is believed that the lower divergent wall section 110 b of the inlet 108 significantly improves material flow through the downcomer 12 and to the conveyor 20. That is to say, the inlet 108 has provided the unexpected result of virtually eliminating interruptions and/or fluctuations in material flow through the downcomer 12 and on the conveyor 20. It has been determined that this is primarily attributable to the fact that the divergent wall section 110 b simply serves to confine the material in an upright column and provides virtually no other support thereto. In otherwords, the risk of bridging of the material across the interior of the divergent wall section 110 b, which is believed to be caused by the cohesiveness of the material overcoming the influence of gravity, is significantly reduced. Therefore, the material confined within the wall section 110 b is continuously presented to the conveyor 20. As perhaps best shown in FIG. 1, the divergent wall section 11 b causes a material column M to be deposited directly onto the conveying stretch 22 a above the series of support rollers 28-38. Because the divergent wall section 110 b provides only lateral support to the material column M, the entire column exerts a pressure downwardly against the conveying stretch 22 a. This downwardly directed pressure causes the material at the base of the column to be rather compacted and have a generally uniform density. Those ordinarily skilled in the art will appreciate that these conditions are often desirable when conveying solid particulate material. In addition, such conditions reduce variances in the amount of material being transferred by the conveyor 20, thereby further reducing the risk of undesirable conveyor speed fluctuations. It is also noted that the downstream section 102 b of the lower edge 102 functions in the desired manner by limiting the amount of material transferred out of the downcomer 12 by the conveyor 20. As shown in FIG. 1, the lower edge 102 cooperates with the conveying stretch 22 a to cause a generally steady, level stream of material to be moved along the flow path.

It is noted that the tube 110 preferably has a circular cross-sectional shape to conform to the shape of the pipe 82. In this respect, the shape of the tube 110 may be varied similar to the pipe 82, although it is preferred that the tube 110 and pipe 82 have generally the same shape. As perhaps best shown in FIG. 2, the wall thickness of the tube 110 is preferably less than the wall thickness of the pipe 82. It will be appreciated that the tube 110 need only be constructed to confine the material therein and be of sufficient thickness to account for wear, while the pipe 82 is preferably designed to certain explosion pressure ratings. That is to say, the tube 110 need not be designed to withstand high internal pressure, as the pipe 82 is already designed to accommodate for such situations. One suitable downcomer construction involves a tube 110 having a wall thickness of approximately 0.125 inch and a pipe having a wall thickness of approximately 0.375 inch. Of course, the wall thickness of the tube 110 may alternatively be greater than the pipe 82. For example, the upper convergent and lower divergent wall sections may have sufficient thickness to entirely consume the space between the inner surface of the pipe 82 and the inner surface of the tube 110. These alternative wall sections will consequently have odd shapes and will likely require such an alternative tube to be molded from a synthetic resin material.

In the illustrated embodiment, the inlet 108 includes a disk-shaped flange 112 that circumscribes the tube 110 and projects radially therefrom, although other suitable structure for mounting the tube 110 within the pipe 82 may be used. The illustrated flange 112 has a circular outermost boundary that corresponds with that of the flanges 88,90 of the adjacent pipe sections 82 a, 82 b (see FIG. 2). The inlet flange 112 includes a series of circumferentially spaced openings (not shown) for receiving the fasteners used to attach the pipe flanges 88 and 90 to one anther, whereby the inlet flange 112 is secured between the pipe flanges 88 and 90. In the preferred embodiment, the flange 112 projects outwardly from the throat 110 c and is consequently located at the junction of the upper wall section 110 a and lower wall section 110 b, although the location of the flange 112 along the length of the tube 110 may be varied as necessary. In addition, the flange 112 may alternatively be welded to one or both of the pipe flanges 88,90.

In this respect, it is possible to retrofit an existing downcomer with the inlet 108 simply by disassembling certain portions of the downcomer. For example, with respect to the illustrated downcomer 12, the valve 80 and the pipe sections 82 a and 82 b are removed from the supply line 14 and lower pipe section 82 c and detached from one another. The lower divergent wall section 110 b is then inserted through the upper end of the removed intermediate pipe section 82 b until the inlet flange 112 engages the pipe flange 90. These components are then coupled to the lower pipe section 82 c by inserting the lower end of the divergent wall section 110 b into the lower pipe section 82 c. The upper pipe section 82 a is then slid over the exposed convergent wall section 110 a, and the pipe flanges 88,90 and inlet flange 112 may then be secured to one another. The inlet valve 80 is inserted between the supply line 14 and upper pipe section 82 a so that the upper pipe section 82 a, intermediate pipe section 82 b, and inlet 108 are suspended from the valve 80. Finally, the expansion joint 92 is secured about the pipe sections 82 b and 82 c.

The operation of the feeder 10 shall be apparent from the foregoing description. Thus, it is sufficient to explain that bulk material is supplied by the line 14 to the downcomer 12. This material flows smoothly and evenly down through the downcomer 12 to the conveyor 20. Particularly, the material flow is first slightly converged by the upper section 110 a of the inlet 108, although such convergence does not noticeably impede material flow. Thereafter, the material passes through the divergent wall section 110 b, whereby bridging of the material across the interior of the downcomer 12 is prevented. The material is consequently confined in the upright column M which moves smoothly and uniformly to the lower open end of the pipe 82. The conveying stretch 22 a of the conveyor 20 urges material at the lower end of the column M leftwardly (when viewing FIGS. 1 and 2), with the downstream section 102 b of the lower edge 102 serving to limit material flow from the downcomer 12.

It is noted that the principles of the present invention are equally applicable to various other feeder constructions. Such an alternative is shown in FIG. 4, wherein the downcomer 200 is not provided with an inlet that serves to define the divergent innermost surface, but rather the pipe 202 is configured to define the divergent innermost surface. Similar to the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1-3, the pipe 202 includes an upper section 202 a, an intermediate section 202 b, and a lower section 202 c fixed to the housing top surface 204. Although the upper pipe section 202 a presents a pipe wall that is straight and parallel to the longitudinal axis of the pipe 202, the intermediate pipe section 202 b and lower pipe section 202 c cooperatively present a pipe wall that diverges downwardly. As indicated above, the angle of divergence presented by the pipe wall may vary, but is preferably 1.25 degrees. It will be appreciated that this design eliminates the need for a reduced diameter throat within the downcomer. The alternative feeder design includes a traditional support pan 206 below the downcomer 200, with the pan 206 serving the same purpose as the support rollers 28-38 shown in FIGS. 1-3. It is noted that the lower pipe section 202 c may alternatively have a straight-walled construction, as long as the lower pipe section is relatively short (e.g., less than twelve inches) and is at least as large in cross-sectional shape as the intermediate pipe section 202 b.

The preferred forms of the invention described above are to be used as illustration only, and should not be utilized in a limiting sense in interpreting the scope of the present invention. Obvious modifications to the exemplary embodiments, as hereinabove set forth, could be readily made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

The inventor hereby states his intent to rely on the Doctrine of Equivalents to determine and assess the reasonably fair scope of the present invention as pertains to any apparatus not materially departing from but outside the literal scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An inlet for installation fit within a material supply downcomer of a bulk material feeder, said downcomer including an outer casino wall and said inlet comprising: a tube configured to fit lengthwise within the downcomer, and having a flat inlet wall including an upper downwardly convergent section that defines a conveying surface, a lower downwardly divergent section that defines a flat divergent surface, and an interconnecting central throat section between the upper convergent section and the lower divergent section, wherein said lower downwardly divergent section has a length that is at least twice the diameter of the outer casing and whereby said lower downwardly divergent section reduces bridging of material across its interior divergent surface.
 2. An inlet as claimed in claim 1; and attachment structure fixed to the tube and configured to support the tube within the downcomer.
 3. An inlet as claimed in claim 2 said attachment structure comprising a flange surrounding the tube and projecting outwardly therefrom.
 4. An inlet as claimed in claim 3, said wall sections of the tube projecting in opposite directions from the flange.
 5. An inlet as claimed in claim 3, said tube having a substantially circular cross-sectional shape, said flange projecting radially from the tube and, having an outermost circular boundary.
 6. An inlet as claimed in claim 1, said lower one of the wall sections having an angle of divergence of at least approximately one degree. 